🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an event that began as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has taken on a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate gatherings where individuals of African heritage are compensated to address white audiences about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The wave has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The period has developed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the observance is commemorated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a valuable example in how co-option leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how critical it is to rethink Black History Month more than the current time in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a elected representative gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are expanding in Europe as a whole.

In the America, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A effort to remove African American heritage and legacy from the historical documents is under way. One of the former president's early administrative commands targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the month illustrates how minimally it can be impactful if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the realities of the current era. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. A university professor, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just discontinue events including Black History Month entirely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an period that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an foundation that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as various establishments are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not shy away from political issues, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves mere awareness of the past when it ignores the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Institutions who observe it should not be reassured with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and alertness to minor insults, but confronted with the dangers that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and adaptive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.